Krishna Kumar Agrawal v. Union Of India, Thr. Ministry Of Environment, New Delhi And Others

2509pil110.18 & others 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 110 OF 2018 (Krishna Kumar Agrawal vs. Union of India and others) WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.65 OF 2018 (Court on its own motion vs. State of Maharashtra and others) WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2018 (Krishna Kumar Agarwal vs. The Ministry of Environment and Forest and others) WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.145 OF 2018 (Dinesh s/o Manohar Shedame vs. Union of India and others) ________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders Court'

s or Judge'

s orders or directions and Registrar'

s orders.

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.110 OF 2018 Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri U.M. Aurangabadkar, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent nos.1, 2 and 17.

Ms. N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.3 to 15.

Shri M.N. Upadhyay, Advocate for respondent no.16. Shri S.S. Sanyal, Advocate for respondent nos.18 to 20. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.65 OF 2018 Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate - amicus curiae, assisted by Adv. N.G. Moharir.

Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 3, 7 to 15, 17 to 30 and 39 to 50. Shri A. Parchure, Advocate and Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 6.

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2018 Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for petitioner. Shri U.M. Aurangabadkar, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent no.1.

Ms. N.P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.2 to 10.

Shri A.M. Ghare, Advocate for respondent no.11. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.145 OF 2018 Shri D.V. Mahajan, Advocate and Shri A.S. Agrawal, Advocate for petitioner.

2509pil110.18 & others 2/2 Shri U.M. Aurangabadkar, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent nos.1 and 2.

Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.3 to 13.

---------- CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 All these public interest litigations can be disposed of as having become infructuous in view of the fact that a new sand policy has already been framed and brought into force by the State Government. Needless to say that if anyone is aggrieved by such policy, he will be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings.

Accordingly, the public interest litigations stand disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE khj