Bombay High CourtWP/834/2019others disposed off

Satish Raghunath Wankhade v. The State Of Mah., Thr. Pso Ps Dist Akola And Another

2019-09-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala1 pages

1 cwp834.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICTURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 834/2019 Satish Raghunath Wankhade, ..VS..

State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Akola, Dist. Akola and Anr., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. U. J. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for the respondents.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, AND PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

DATED : 18 th September, 2019 The learned A.P.P. Shri T.A. Mirza, pointed out that the appellate powers under Section 60 are delegated to the Divisional Commissioner and therefore, the petitioner can avail statutory remedy which is now efficacious also. Accepting the statement made by learned A.P.P., we decline to entertain this petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy.

The petition is disposed accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE Kirtak