← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6700/2022disposed off

Ku. Ankita D/O Milind Shriramji Tayde v. The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati And Others

2022-11-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi2 pages

1 49 wp 6700.2022

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6700 OF 2022 Ku. Ankita d/o Milind Shriramji Tayde ..vs..

The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri D.M. Totey, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri S.M. Ukey, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1/State. Shri D.G. Gawande, Advocate h/f Shri M.G. Rathi, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 and 3.

Shri C.R. Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 4. CORAM :

VINAY JOSHI , J J .

DATED :

21/11/2022.

Heard.

2.

The only prayer is for seeking direction to respondent no. 1/Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati to grant petitioner an opportunity of hearing in case No.43/MVP Act, 1959 Sec.39(1) Shirala/Amravati/2021-22 (CRN.3076/2022).

3.

It is contended that respondent no. 1 without granting an opportunity to the petitioner has closed the matter for final decision.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.

4/original complainant conceded that opportunity can be given to the petitioner before the Divisional Commissioner. It appears that nothing would survived if opportunity is given to the petitioner by the Divisional Commission in the pending proceeding. 5.

In view of that both sides shall appear before

2 49 wp 6700.2022 respondent no. 1/Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati on 25.11.2022 on which the Divisional Commissioner shall fix a date of hearing as per convenience of all parties.

6.

The Commissioner on fix date shall given hearing to the petitioner and if the respondents desire shall also give him hearing in response and decide the matter on merits.

7.

The petition stands disposed of in above terms. No order as to costs.

(VINAY JOSHI, J.) Trupti TRUPTI SANTOSHJI AGRAWAL 21.11.2022 17:38