← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/640/2016allowed

Sachin S/O. Wamanrao Matte v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ambazari, Nagpur

2016-10-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre2 pages

aba.640.16 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [ABA] No.640 of 2016 (Sachin Wamanrao Matte vs.

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Ambazari, Nagpur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri R.M. Daga, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri T..A. Mirza, A.P.P. for the Non-Applicant/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 20 th OCTOBER, 2016.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

Upon perusal of the case-diary, it appears that, prima facie, there is a background of love affair between the prosecutrix and this applicant, which could not see its logical end.

Considering the nature of allegations, I do not think that any custodial interrogation of the applicant would be required. The application, therefore, deserves to be allowed. Hence, the order.

The application is allowed and the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant by this Court on 29th September, 2016 is hereby confirmed on the same conditions. The application is disposed of accordingly.

*sdw JUDGE

aba.640.16 2 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of the original signed order.

Uploaded by: S.D. Waghmare Uploaded on : 20/10/2016 P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.