← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1309/2017dismissedrule discharged

Iftekar S/O Shahezad Hussain And Another v. Vakil Ansari And Another

2017-11-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar2 pages

0311fca11.17+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Family Court Appeal No.11 of 2017 [Iftekar s/o Shahezad Hussain and another v. Mohd. Vakil s/o Abdul Rashid and another] Along with Family Court Appeal No.12 of 2017 [Iftekar s/o Shahezad Hussain and another v. Vakil Ansari and others] Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order Ms Shabana Diwan, Advocate for Appellants.

Shri Masood Shareef, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Coram : R.K. Deshpande & M.G. Giratkar, JJ.

Date : 3 rd November, 2017 Civil Application (CAO) No.1309 of 2017 :

The order dated 19-7-2017 passed by this Court clearly states that after a year or two, the appellants would be entitled to make an application for increasing the frequency in respect of the visitation rights as at that stage, the Court did not find any reason to disturb the child who was less than three years of age and was in the custody of the respondents since his birth.

0311fca11.17+ To entertain this civil application, would amount to review of the said order, and hence the civil application is dismissed.

Judge.

Judge.

Lanjewar