Bombay High CourtWP/5852/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Purshottam Hiramanji Dakhale v. State Of Maha., Through Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai And Another

2016-11-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp5852.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5852 OF 2016 [Purshottam Hiramanji Dakhale .vs. State of Maharashtra and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Rucha Pande, counsel for the petitioner, Shri A.M. Joshi, AGP for the respondents.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 21, 2016.

Ms. Pande, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that in view of the subsequent development, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.

In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA