Amol S/O Jai Singh Rajput v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Pso, Ps, Janefal, Tah. Mehkar, Dist. Buldhana

1 / 2 18- aba 642-25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION(ABA) NO.642 OF 2025 Amol Jai Singh Rajput Vs. State of Maharashtra ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Rajesh Nayak counsel for the applicant.

Mr. D.V.Chauhan a/b Mr. Anant Ghogare, APP for the State.

CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 26/09/2025 1.

The applicant has filed the second application for granting Anticipatory Bail before this Court. Maintainability is challenged before this Court. As per order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, there is no bar to file second bail application, subject to change in the circumstance as per law.

2. The learned Government Pleader has pointed out the observations made by the Supreme Court in the case of Sharad Vs. The state of Maharashtra and anr. in Criminal Appeal No.1221 of 2019 that if the court has rejected the bail application and second bail application is filed then the applicant has to first approach the Sessions Court and then Kavita

2 / 2 18- aba 642-25 only approach before this Court. Considering this fact, and as the charge-sheet is filed, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to approach before the trial Court. 3.

Permission is granted with liberty as prayed for. 4.

Criminal Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

JUDGE Kavita