Narsing S/O Bhuggappa Kaveri v. Smt. Archana Wd/O Subhash Salam And Others
914fa1351.17.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.2617/2018 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1351/2017 Narsing s/o Bhuggappa Kaveri Vs.
Smt. Archana wd/o Subhash Salam and others.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri N.A. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Shri A.V.Bhide, Advocate for the non-applicant/respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for the non-applicant/respondent No.4. Shri D.N.Kukday, Advocate for the non-applicant/respondent No.5. CORAM: ARUN D. UPADHYE , J.
DATE: 21-11-2018.
Heard Shri N.A. Gaikwad, learned Counsel for the applicant, Shri A.V. Bhide, learned Counsel for the non-applicant Nos. 1 to 3, Shri A.A. Dhawas, learned Counsel for the non-applicant No.4 and Shri D.N. Kukday, learned Counsel for the non-applicant No.5.
Perused the application. The applicant/appellant has deposited the entire amount of award i.e. Rs. 5,57,064/-. As per the award, the respondent No.1 is granted Rs. 2,57,064/- and the respondent No.3 is granted amount of Rs. 1,25,000/-. The respondent No.2 is minor aged about 3 years, at the time of accident. The amount of Rs. 1,75,000/- was directed to be deposited in fixed deposit in Nationalized Bank for the period till she attains the majority.
Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the amount of Rs. 1,75,000/-
914fa1351.17.odt 2 cannot be permitted to be withdrawn as the respondent No.2 is minor. The applicant/appellant has submitted that at the most, half of the amount could be permitted to be withdrawn to the respondent Nos. 1 and 3.
Considering the submission of the learned Counsel for the applicant/appellant, the respondent No.1 could be permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs. 2,57,064/- and the respondent No.3 could be permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- towards compensation.
Hence, I pass the following order.
ORDER
[i] The application is partly allowed.
[ii] The respondent No.1 is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- on furnishing usual undertaking before the learned Registrar (Judl.) of this Court and respondent No. 3 is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- by furnishing usual undertaking before the learned Registrar (Judl.).
The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE rkn