Bombay High CourtAPEAL/862/2008others disposed off

Vijay Rameshchandra Chandak v. Sunilkumar Champalal Rathi And ORS.

2018-10-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 apeal862.08

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.862 OF 2008 (VIJAY RAMESHCHANDRA CHANDAK...VS.. SUNILKUMAR CHAMPALAL RATHI & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Saurabh Tapdia, Adv h/f. Shri V.R.Mundra, Advocate for Appellant. Shri A.S.Thotange, Adv. h/f. Shri M.G.Sarda, Adv. for Respondent No.1. Shri V.P.Gangane, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : OCTOBER 29, 2018.

Shri Saurabh Tapdia, Advocate holding for Shri V.R.Mundra, Advocate for the appellant makes a statement that the matter is amicably settled between the parties and the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. It is submitted that pursis will be filed accordingly within a week. The advocate for the respondent No.1 does not dispute the above submission.

In view of the above submission, the appeal is disposed as withdrawn. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE RRaut..