← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2092/2018rejected at admission stage

Manohar Bapurao Khorgade And Anor. v. The State Of Mah. Thru. Chief Secty. And 5 ORS.

2018-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Murlidhar Ganpatrao Giratkar2 pages

0309caw2092.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CAW NO. 2092/2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6177 OF 2006 (Shri Manohar s/o Bapurao Khorgade & Anr. vs. The state of Maharashtra & Ors.) _____________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & M.G. GIRATKAR, JJ.

SEPTEMBER 03, 2018.

Heard Shri F.T. Mirza, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri S.Y. Deopujari, learned GP for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Shri S.M. Puranik, learned counsel for respondent No. 5 - Corporation and Shri S.K. Mishra, learned Senior Advocate for respondent No. 6 - Nagpur Improvement Trust.

2.

Sau. Pramilabai Ashok Sawarkar is present with Shri Matale, Advocate. Upon instructions from her, Shri Matale, Advocate informs that the women residing in the locality adjacent to garden nominated her as President. 3.

Shri Mishra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent - Nagpur Improvement Trust informs that the piece of land in dispute belongs to the State Government and on it Nagpur Municipal Corporation has developed a garden for use of public.

4.

The statement made by Shri Mishra, learned

0309caw2092.18 Senior Advocate on instructions is endorsed by Shri Puranik, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation. 5.

In this situation, it is apparent that the temple which has come up in public garden cannot continue. 6.

We, in this situation, reject Civil Application No. 2092 of 2018. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE *GS.

Gopichand Tanwarram Shamdasani Date: 2018.09.04 10:29:29 +0530 Gopichand Tanwarram Shamdasani