Bombay High CourtWP/3360/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri Agrasen Shikshan Sanstha, Rajegaon Through Its President And 2 Others v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Deptt. Of Education, Mumbai And 2 Others

2016-06-27Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

2706wp3360.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3360/2016 Shri Agrasen Shikshan Sanstha, Rajegaon, Tah. Distt. Gondia, through its President and others ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.N. Shende, Advocate for petitioners Shri A.M. Balpande, AGP for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 27.06.2016 The only prayer made by the petitioners is for a direction to the respondent no.3 - Education Officer (Secondary) to decide the proposal for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioner no.3, as a peon.

It is stated that since the school is brought on grant-in-aid from 2013-2014, it would be necessary to grant approval to the appointment of the petitioner no.3 from the date on which the school was brought on grant-in-aid. It is stated that the petitioners give up the claim for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioner no.3 w.e.f. 31.7.2008. Shri Balpande, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent no.2 states that the proposal

2706wp3360.16.odt of the petitioners is pending with the respondent no.2 and the same would be decided as early as possible.

In view of the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the proposal for grant of approval to the appointment of the petitioner no.3 as early as possible and positively within a period of four months. Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar