← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7238/2022allowed

Pragya Vikas Shikshan Sanstha, Gondia Thr. Secretary And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, School Education Dept. Mumbai And Another

2023-06-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani3 pages

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION OF Petitioners :

1. Pragya Vikas Shikshan Sanstha, Gondia, Through its Secretary, Office at T.B. Toli, Gondia, Tah. and District - Gondia.

2. Shri Gurudeo Vidyalaya, Girola (Kamtha), Tah. and District Gondia, Head Master.

3. Vikesh s/o Bhaulal Girepunje, Aged about 24 years, Occupation - Service, R/o At and Post - Girola, Tah. and District Gondia. - Versus - Respondents :

1. State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032.

2. Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Gondia, Tah. and District - Gondia. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. I.N. Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. S.M. Ukey, Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

CORAM:

ROHIT B. DEO AND M.W. CHANDWANI, JJ.

DATE :

th JUNE, 2023.

J U D G M E N T : (Per M.W. Chandwani, J.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties.

2/3 02] By the impugned communication dated 26/09/2022 issued by respondent 2-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Gondia refused to grant approval to the appointment of petitioner no.3 on the ground that there is ban on recruitment.

03] It is an admitted fact that petitioner 1 is a minority institution. It is well settled that for a minority institution to make recruitment, ban on recruitment is not applicable but, the Education Officer has put forward this very reason. The learned Additional Government Pleader fairly admits that petitioner 1 is a minority educational institution and, therefore, the reliance placed by the learned Counsel for the petitioners on the decision rendered by this Court in the matter of Ubhajo Shikshan Sanstha and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others in Writ Petition No.2538/2021 on 16/11/2021, is squarely applicable to the present petition, which it has been held that the ban on recruitment by the State Government is not applicable to minority institutions.

04] Accordingly, we allow the petition. The impugned communication dated 26/09/2022 is hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded back to respondent 2-Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Gondia for fresh decision in accordance with law. It is further directed that the

3/3 decision in accordance with this order shall be taken by respondent 2 as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within a period of six weeks from today.

05] Rule accordingly with no order as to costs.

(M.W. CHANDWANI, J.) (ROHIT B. DEO, J.) *sandesh Signed by:SANDESH DAULATRAO WAGHMARE Private Secretary to the Hon'ble Judge Date :01.07.2023 14:35