Shri Rajesh S/O Laxmanrao Vispute v. Shri Narottam Prasad Badrinarayan Chejjara @ Kumawat

903 revn185.12 +1.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (REVN) NO. 185 OF 2012 Rajesh s/o Laxmanrao Vispute Vs.

Narottam Prasad Badrinarayan Chejjara alias Kumwat WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (REVN) NO. 186 OF 2012 Rajesh s/o Laxmanrao Vispute Vs.

Narottam Prasad Badrinarayan Chejjara alias Kumwat _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court'

s or Judge'

s orders.

and Registrar'

s Orders.

Shri A.S. Dhore, Advocate for applicant.

Shri D.T. Harinkhede, Advocate for non-applicant. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : JANUARY 22, 2021.

These two criminal revisions are filed by accused who was convicted by the learned Magistrate for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, on the complaint filed by the non-applicant herein. The judgment and order passed by the learned Magistrate was confirmed by the learned Appellate Court, therefore the present revisions are filed.

(2) During the pendency of these revisions and looking to the nature of the dispute, the parties were directed that they should have mediation from the trained mediator. Accordingly, applicant and non-applicant appeared before the learned Mediator and with the

903 revn185.12 +1.odt intervention of learned Mediator, the applicant and nonapplicant settled their dispute finally and they have executed agreement to that effect.

(3) The Co-ordinator of Mediation Center, High Court, Nagpur has submitted a report stating that mediation has attended success and also filed the agreement, which was executed before the learned Mediator. The agreement is duly signed by the applicant/accused and his counsel - Shri Anup Dhore; complainant/non-applicant and his counsel - Shri D.T. Harinkhede.

(4) In view of the aforesaid, these two criminal revisions are disposed of by setting aside the conviction imposed upon the applicant.

(5) In pursuance to the compromise, the applicant/accused has deposited Rs.1,50,000/-. Surely, the non-applicant/complainant is entitled to withdraw the same. Accordingly, non-applicant- Narrottam Prasad Badrinarayan is permitted to withdraw the amount of Rs.1,50,000/- deposited by applicant.

(6) Both the revision applications are disposed of. JUDGE Wagh