Bombay High CourtCAF/3789/2017ca disposed off

Laxmandas S/O Arjundas Jakhwani And Others v. Sumitradevi W/O Damodhar Agrawal (Zhunzhunwala) And Others

2017-09-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre2 pages

2609 FA 81-2001 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

C.A.F. No. 3787/2017 IN FIRST APPEAL No. 81/2001 (LAXMANDAS ARJUNDAS LAKHWANI AND OTHERS -vs- SUMITRADEVI DAMODHAR AGRAWAL (ZHUNZHUNWALA AND OTHERS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

Shri M.R. Joharapurkar, counsel for appellants. Shri S.S. Sharma, counsel for respondent nos.1 and 2. CORAM: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2017.

Issue notice to respondent nos.1, 2 and 4, returnable in three weeks.

C.A.F. No. 3788/2017.

Issue notice to respondent nos.1, 2 and 4, returnable in three weeks.

C.A.F. No. 3789/2017.

Heard.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed and the name of appellant no.3 is permitted to be deleted from the array of appellants, at the risk of the appellants.

Application is disposed of.

C.A.F. No.

8659/2004.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

2609 FA 81-2001 2/2 None appears for the proposed legal heirs of respondent no.3, though duly served.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed. Abatement of the appeal against respondent no.3 is set aside.

Application is disposed of.

C.A.F. No. 8658/2004.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

None appears for the proposed legal heirs of respondent no.3, though duly served.

For the reasons stated in the application, delay occurred in filing an application to bring on record, legal heirs of respondent no.3, is condoned. Application is disposed of.

C.A.F. No. 2377/2005.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

None appears for the proposed legal heirs of respondent no.3, though duly served.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed. The proposed legal heirs of respondent no.3 be brought on record.

Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks.

Application is disposed of.

JUDGE Yenurkar