Rashmi W/O Milind Pawar v. Milind S/O Sadashiv Pawar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION O. NO.1464/2014 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO.20744/2014 Rashmi w/o Milind Pawar ...Versus...
Milind s/o Sadashiv Pawar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.S. Ghate, Advocate for applicant CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 09.09.2015 Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent, though served. The respondent has also not filed any reply to the application for condonation of delay. The statements of facts made in the civil application remain uncontroverted.
Hence, for the reasons stated in paragraph nos.4 to 6 of the application, we condone the delay in filing the family court appeal.
The civil application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar