Bombay High CourtWP/772/2024dismissed

Firoz Khan Chandkhan Pathan v. Divisional Commissioner Amravati, Dist. Amravati And Another

2025-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:311 1 18.wp.772.24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 772/2024 Firoz Khan Chandkhan Pathan (C-6296) Vs.

Divisional Commissioner,amravati and Anr.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. R. Muddalwar, Advocate h/f. Ms Ratna Singh, Advocate for Petitioner.

Ms N. R. Tripathi, A.P.P. for Respondents/State. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 13/01/2025.

While considering the reply placed on record, particularly about the surety being not identified for the reason the petitioner having furnished incorrect information, no illegality could be noticed in the order impugned, the petition accordingly fails, stands dismissed. 2.

However, this is not preclude the petitioner from applying afresh.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule