Ashok S/O Gulbchand Bhutada v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Department Of Water Supply And Cleanliness And 2 Oth.

PIL86-12 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 86/2012 (ASHOK GULABCHAND BHUTADA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.S. Khandewale, counsel for the petitioner. Mrs. Rashi Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri D.M. Kakani, counsel for the R-2.

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 4 , 2015 .

Perused the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.2.

It is submitted that the work of extension of the pipeline from Umarsara Distribution Pipeline to Sai Nagar and Malani Nagar is already over. It further states that as and when the applications are received for supply of tap connections, the same would be decided in accordance with the procedure.

In that view of the matter, petition has served its purpose. The same is, therefore, disposed of. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE APTE