Bombay High CourtCAO/1919/2015ca disposed off

Parshuram S/O Kankiram Panchad v. Murlidhar S/O Hamku Madavi And 3 Others

2016-09-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 cao1919.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1919 OF 2015 IN CROSS APPEAL/OBJECTION ST. NO. 16696 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 921 OF 2013 (PARSHURAM KANKIRAM PANCHAD...VS..MURLIDHAR HAMKU MADAVI & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Gauravsingh Sengar, adv. h/f. Shri S.A. Deo, Adv. for applicant/ Respondent No.2/Cross-Objector.

Mrs T.D.Khade, Advocate for Appellant-Insurance Co. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2016.

The respondent No.2 (owner of the vehicle) has filed cross-objection and in that cross-objection this civil application is filed praying that the requirement of depositing Rs.25,000/- as per Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Rule 12-A of Chapter IV of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 be dispensed with. On instructions, the learned advocate for the respondent No.2/cross-objector seeks permission to withdraw the cross-objection with liberty to file appeal. The cross-objection is disposed accordingly with liberty as prayed for.

In view of withdrawal of the cross-objection, the civil application does not survive and it is disposed accordingly.

JUDGE RRaut..

2 cao1919.15 CERTIFICATE I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

Uploaded by : R.B. Raut, PS Uploaded on : 01/09/2016.