Sau. Reshma Sachin Yeul v. Sachin Ramkrushna Yeul

(1) spl 1 mca 858-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (TR.) NO. 858 OF 2024 Sau. Reshma Sachin Yeul Vs.

Sachin Ramkrushna Yeul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------- - - - - - Ms S.S. Ketkar, Advocate h/f Shri U.J. Deshpande, Advocate for applicant Shri D.P. Dapurkar, Advocate for non applicant CORAM : SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

DATE : 21.04.2025 It appears that matter was referred to the Mediator and as per report dated 05/04/2025, the matter is settled between the parties. They have executed compromise deed. The compromise deed is taken on record and it is marked as 'X' for identification. It would be the part of order in MCA No. 858/2024. Parties in person are present and identified by their respective Counsel. The contents of the compromise deed are verified from the parties. As the terms of the compromise are in the interest of the parties and voluntarily made, the civil application is disposed of in the terms of compromise deed. Parties to abide by the compromise deed. (SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) Jayashree..