Sandip S/O Gautam Humane And Another v. State Of Mha. Thr. Pso Ps Dattapur Tq.Dhamangaon Railway Dist.Amravati And Another

62aba785.2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 785 OF 2022 Sandip s/o Gautam Humane and another .Vs. State of Maharashtra, thr. PSO, Dattapur, Tq. Dhamangaon Railway, Dist. Amravati and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr A.M. Tirukh, Advocate for the applicants.

Mrs Shamshi Haider, Advocate for the non-applicant No.1.. Ms Ashta Sharma, Adv. h/f Shri P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for non-applicant No.2.

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED : 05/12/ 1.

Heard.

2.

The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.590/2022 registered with Police Station Dattapur, Tq. Dhamgangaon Railway, District Amravati for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 354, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3.

After going through the contents of the FIR, it can be seen that there appears to be some enmity between the father of the informant and the applicants and if the allegations are looked into from that perspective coupled with the fact that though the incident took place on a public road, there is not a single independent witness to the incident, prima-facie, I am of the opinion that, in absence of any incriminating material against the applicants, the rkn

62aba785.2022.odt custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary. Accordingly, I pass the following order:

a) The criminal application is allowed.

b) The order granting ad-interim anticipatory bail dated 10/11/2022, is hereby confirmed.

c) The applicants shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when their presence is required. JUDGE Signed By:RAJESH K NANDURKAR rkn