Mangesh S/O Madhav Yadavkule v. The Sc,Vj,Nt,Obc And Sbc Divisional Caste Certificate Verification Committee No.I, Amravati,And ORS

cao17.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR

BENCH, NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAO) No.17 of 2014 in MCA (Review) St.No.20784 of 2013 in W.P. No.5322 of 2012 Mangesh Yadavkule ..vs.. The Scheduled Caste, Vimukta Jati, Nomadic Tribe, OBC and Special Backward Category, Divisional Caste Certificate Verification Committee No.1, Amravati Division, Amravati, thr President and ors .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri S.D. Chopde, counsel for the applicant/petitioner.

CORAM

: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 9, 2015.

Civil Application (CAO) No.17 of 2014 Heard.

For reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

Delay is condoned.

The civil application is disposed of.

MCA (Review) St.No.20784 of 2013 Heard.

Learned counsel has invited our attention to affidavit dated 20.9.2010 urging that the affidavit has not been looked into. When learned counsel is asked about the date of Vigilance Cell Report, he

cao17.17 submits that the Vigilance Cell Report was prior to that affidavit.

We find that the statement is incorrect.

Learned counsel, who was earlier appearing in writ petition, was given full opportunity and after hearing him, the matter has been decided.

The civil application for review is, therefore, rejected.

JUDGE JUDGE !! BRW !!