Bombay High CourtPIL/89/2014dismissedrule discharged

Shri Mangesh S/O Keshavraj Chikhale And Anothers v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary Of Urban Development Department, Mumbai And 3 Other

2016-12-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande1 pages

pil89.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.89/2014 Mahesh s/o Keshavraj Chikhale and anr. ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. M. Ghare, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. M. K. Pathan, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 4. Mr. S. C. Mehadia, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2016 Heard.

To appreciate the submissions made by the petitioners, various disputed questions of fact, which require evidence to be led, need to be considered. Such an exercise would not be permissible in the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court.

The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

JUDGE JUDGE kahale