Sau. Manisha Madanmohan Agrawal And 2 Others v. Satyanarayan Dulichandji Agrawal And Others

2024:BHC-NAG:12050 1 wp 7163.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 7163 OF 2019 (Sau. Manisha Madanmohan Agrawal and ors. .vs. Satyanarayan Dulichandji Agrawal and ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.

DATED : 24-10-2024 On previous date, following order was passed. Ms Richa Kalraiya instructed by Shri A.H. Daga, learned Counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners have engaged another Counsel by taking no objection from Shri A.H. Daga. She submits that the client has taken back the brief and, accordingly, seeks discharge.

2] On the strength of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioners across the bar, Shri A.H. Daga, learned Counsel, stands discharged. 3] It appears that despite taking no objection from Shri A.H. Daga, the petitioners have not engaged any Counsel, in the sense, there appears no Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners.

4] List under the caption 'For dismissal' on 24/10/2024."

None present for the petitioners. Writ petition is dismissed.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik