Bombay High CourtCP/296/2012dispossed offdismiss for default

Prakashchandra S/O Hiralalji Pathak v. State Of Mah. Thr. Its Secty. And ORS

2016-01-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh1 pages

1201cp296.12.odt 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 296 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1960 OF 2012 (D) (Prakashchandra Hiralalji Pathak Vs. The State of Maharashtra & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri G. G. Mishra, Advocate for the petitioner. A. G. P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED : 12 JANUARY, 2016 Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the order passed by this Court on 08/8/2012 in Writ Petition No. 1960 of 2012, of which the contempt is alleged in the present petition.

In that view of the matter, we do not find it necessary to proceed further in the matter. Contempt petition is disposed of as such.

JUDGE JUDGE wwl