Namdeo Laxmanrao Yeotkar v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Collector And Land Acquisition Officer, Akola And Others
1 108cao1072.2025.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 1072 OF 2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 20251 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4032 OF 2025 (Namdeo Laxmanrao Yeotkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.A. Kathane, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. N.R. Patil, AGP for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 4/State. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 24, 2025.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2.
For the reasons stated, the application for condonation of delay in filing restoration application is allowed. Delay of 19 days caused in filing restoration application is condoned. For the reasons stated in the application, the application for restoration of writ petition is also allowed. Writ petition be restored at its original stage. The applications are disposed of. WRIT PETITION NO. 4032 OF 2025 Heard.
2.
So far as writ petition is concerned, the request of the petitioner is that direction be given to the respondents to exchange the property mentioned in prayer clause. Learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that he has not made any request to the respondent authorities regarding exchange of the land. He further submits that the grievance would be redressed, if necessary directions are given to the respondents.
3.
Be that as it may, the issue can be redressed by giving direction to
2 108cao1072.2025. respondent No. 2. In the aforesaid background, we direct that present petition be treated as representation of the petitioner and it shall be decided by respondent No. 2, in accordance with law, within ten weeks from receipt of copy of this order along with the petition. The petitioner shall communicate the order passed today to respondent No. 2 within two weeks. Needless to mention that an opportunity of hearing be granted to the interested parties. Petition is disposed of. (RAJNISH R. VYAS, J) (ANIL S.KILOR,J) RS Belkhede, PS