Bombay High CourtWP/5959/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Amol S/O Shankar Banduke v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Revenue And Forest Department, Mumbai And 2 Others

2016-08-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

WP5959-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 5959/2014 (AMOL SHANKAR BANDUKE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.S. Warulkar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Rode, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri A.M. Sudame, counsel for the R-2 & 3.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 09 , 2016.

Shri Warulkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the learned counsel does not have any instructions in the matter. It is stated that though the learned counsel had tried to contact the petitioner telephonically and also by issuing communications, the petitioner is not responding. It is stated that in the aforesaid circumstances, the learned counsel would not be in a position to conduct the matter. In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE

WP5959-14 CERTIFICATE copy of original signed Judgment/Order.

Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte.

Uploaded on : 11.08.2016.