← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6179/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Sachin S/O Devidas Dolas v. State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mumbai

2016-12-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp6179.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6179 OF 2016 [Sachin s/o Devidas Dolas .vs. State of Maharashtra] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.C. Phadnis, counsel for the petitioner, Ms. H.N. Prabhu, AGP for the respondent.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 05, 2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction against the respondent to protect the services of the petitioner, in view of the judgment of the Full Bench.

Ms. Prabhu, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-Scrutiny Committee states that since the petitioner is only seeking the protection of services and is working in Mantralaya, it would be necessary for the petitioner to file the petition at the principal seat. It is stated that the Nagpur Bench would not have the jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition.

We uphold the objection raised on behalf of the respondent and decline to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The ad-interim relief granted by this Court on 21.10.2016 to continue for six weeks. The points raised in the writ petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA