Miss. Manda Mahadeo Gajbhiye And Others v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Hingna Police Station Nagpur And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.545 OF 2016 Surabhi D/o Rajendra Shirpurkar and ors ..vs..

State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Incharge, Hingna Police Station Hingna, District Nagpur and anr AND CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.737 OF 2016 Miss. Manda Mahadeo Gajbhiye and ors ..vs..

State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Hingna Police Station, District Nagpur and ors ....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ....................................................................................................................................................... APL No.545/2016 Shri Nihalsing Rathod, counsel for the applicants. Shri Abhay Sukhdeve, counsel for non-applicant Nos.2 to 7. Shri V.P. Maldhure, Addll.P.P. for non-applicant No.1/State. APL No.737/2016 Shri A.K. Sukhdeve, counsel for the applicants. Shri V.P. Maldhure, Addll.P.P. for non-applicant No.1/State.

CORAM

: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA K. JAIN, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 2, 2016.

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

Respective learned counsel appearing for the private parties state that the dispute is amicably settled between the parties and the affidavits are accordingly filed before this Court by all of them .....2/-

separately.

The parties present before this Court are identified by their respective learned counsel. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has pointed out the involvement of Sections 143 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code in the matters. It appears that alleged assembly was within the premises of an Aashram School receiving grant-inaid from the State Government. Non-applicant No.2Gajanan Umate is employee of that School. The applicants claim that they had gone their to cover news items about mis-management and mal-administration of Aashram School.

In view of separate affidavits placed on record, as we find that no public angle is involved, we make the Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (A) of both the criminal applications.

The criminal applications are accordingly allowed and disposed of. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE !! BRW !!

.....3/-

C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this Order/Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.

Uploaded by : Bhushan R.Wankhede.

Uploaded on :- 5/12/2016 (Personal Assistant) ...../-