← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6100/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Arun S/O. Bajirao Kale v. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Devp. Project, Pandharkawada, And Others

2016-01-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

wp6100.15 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 6100 OF 2015 Arun S/o Bajirao Kale -vsThe Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Pandharkawada and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.B.G.Kulkarni, counsel for the petitioner.

Mr.N.S.Rao, AGP for the respondent No.1.

Mr.K.S.Narwade, counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Vipul Bhise, counsel for the respondent No.4. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : 25.01.2016.

Shri Narwade, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3, states that the issue involved in this case was also involved in Writ Petition No.6099 of 2015 (Yogesh S/o Ramdas Raut v. The Project Officer, Integrated Tribal Development Project, Pandharkawada and others) and this Court has, by an order dated 21/12/2015, disposed of the writ petition by refusing to interfere with the order of transfer. The learned counsel seeks a similar order in this case also.

Shri B. G. Kulkarni, the learned counsel for the petitioner, does not dispute that a similar issue was decided on 21/12/2015 in Writ Petition No.6099 of 2015 and this Court has upheld the order of transfer.

For the reasons recorded in the order, dated 21/12/2015 in Writ Petition No.6099 of 2015, we dispose of this writ petition as we are not inclined to interfere with the order of transfer. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE