← Library
Bombay High CourtREVN/222/2023rejected

Ajay Kashinath Shirsole v. Satyabhama Ajay Shirsole And 2 Others

2023-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare2 pages

2023:BHC-NAG:14957 REVN.222.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT NAGPUR, NAGPUR.

...

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.222/2023 Ajay Kashinath Shirsole .. Applicant/s versus 1.Sau.Satyabhama Ajay Shirsole and others ..Respondent/s ............................................................................................................. Mr.R.D. Karode, Advocate for the applicant/s ..............................................................................................................

CORAM

: ANIL L. PANSARE, J.

DATE D : 11th October, 2023.

PC:

Challenge is to the order dated 25th May 2023 passed below Exh.7, by the learned Family Court, Akola whereby the applicanthusband is directed to pay to his daughters i.e. Respondent No.2, aged about 12 years and Respondent No.3, aged about 2-years, an interim maintenance @ Rs. 9,000/- p.m. and 6000/- p.m. respectively. 2.

Heard Mr. R.D.Karode, the learned counsel for the applicant. It appears that the applicant and non-applicants are working in Police Department. The non-applicant no.2 and 3 i.e. daughters are residing with non-applicant no.1-wife. The Family Court noted that the responsibility to maintain the children is of the parents i.e. applicant and non-applicant no.1. It is further noted that the applicant has not contributed a single pie to maintain his daughters. The Family Court has considered the living standard, income and the living expenses while granting interim maintenance. The Family Court has also factored in the earning of the parents. The husband is earning Rs.60,000/- whereas the wife is earning Rs. 50,000/-, per month.

REVN.222.23 3.

Thus, it appears that the Family Court has taken into account the necessary ingredients while granting interim maintenance. I do not find any perversity or illegality in the impugned order. There is no merit in Revision. The same is rejected.

4.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that the Family Court be requested to explore the possibility of amicable settlement. This request can be made before the Family Court and if the same is made, the Family Court would consider the same favourably. [ANIL L. PANSARE, J.] sahare