Umakant S/O Narayanrao Patil v. State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. Pulgaon, Wardha

0102aba 590.604.15. odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application (ABA) No.590 of 2015 (Hemant s/o Ramdas Madavi v. The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S. Pulgaon, District Wardha) And Criminal Application (ABA) No.604 of 2015 (Umakant s/o Narayanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O., P.S. Pulgaon, District Wardha) Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order In Criminal Application (ABA) No.590 of 2015 : Shri S.G. Karmarkar, Advocate for Applicant.

Shri A.M. Deshpande, APP for Respondent.

Shri S.A. Chaudhari, Advocate - Assisting the Prosecution. In Criminal Application (ABA) No.604 of 2015 : Shri Mahesh Rai, Advocate for Applicant.

Shri A.M. Deshpande, APP for Respondent.

Shri S.A. Chaudhari, Advocate - Assisting the Prosecution. Coram : R.K. Deshpande, J.

Date : 1 st February, 2016 The question of involvement of both the applicants in the offences under Sections 420 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is under investigation.

0102aba 590.604.15. odt The complaint is that the amount of Rs.10,00,000/- was taken by the accused persons from the complainant to provide an employment as Shikshan Sevak. The complaint is that no proposal was sent for approval, and upon insistence of the complainant, an amount of Rs.20,000/- was refunded by the applicant-Hemant Madavi. The remaining amount is also required to be recovered from the accused persons. In such an event, no case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail. Both these criminal applications are rejected. Judge.

Lanjewar