← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/948/2022allowed

Rajni Naresh Giradkar v. Naresh Pandurang Giradkar

2022-12-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

cao948.22 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.948/2022 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.56/2014 Rajni w/o Naresh Giradkar ..vs..

Naresh s/o Pandurang Giradkar, died, thr.his Legal Heirs Smt.Radhabai wd/o Pandurang Giradkar : Applicant/Respondent No.1.2 .......................................................................................................................................................................... OfÏce Notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders .......................................................................................................................................................................... Shri A.H.Matetwar, Counsel for the Applicant/Respondent No.1.2. Shri R.M.Wasnik, Counsel for Respondent No.1.1. Shri P.D.Ganvir, Counsel for the Appellant/Wife. CORAM : A.S.CHANDURKAR & URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, JJ. DATED : 02/12/2022 1.

This is an application for speaking to minutes by respondent No.1.2 in Family Court Appeal No.56/2014. 2.

This Court vide judgment and order dated 21.10.2022 dismissed the said Family Court Appeal filed by the wife. However, in the judgment and order some typographical mistakes are occurred and the same are corrected, as under:

(i) words, "Accordingly, point Nos.2 to 4 are answered in negative", appearing at paragraph No.30 (page No.28), should be read as, "Accordingly, point Nos.2 and 3 are answered in affirmative and 4 is answered in negative".

(ii) words, "Learned Advocate for the appellant-wife" appearing in 5th line from the top of page No.21 (paragraph No.22) and at .....2/-

cao948.22 1 paragraph No.23 (page No.21), should be read as, "Learned Advocate for the respondent-husband." (iii) The surname "Mattewar", Advocate for Respondent No.1.2 appearing in cause title and at paragraph No.8 (page No.7), should be read as, "Matetwar".

3.

The corrections be carried out and corrected copy of order be uploaded accordingly.

4.

The civil application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.) !! BrWankhede !!

by BHUSHAN RANA WANKHEDE Date:

2022.12.07 17:42:01 +0530 BHUSHAN RANA WANKHEDE ...../-