Ramesh S/O Tulshiram Dholekar And Others v. Shashikar S/O Tryambak Saoji (Dead) Through Lrs. Govind S/O Shashikar Mahajan (Dead) And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.
(Ramesh Tulshiram Dholekar and others Vs. Shashikar s/o Tryambak Saoji) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Abhay Sambre, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. S. Khan, Advocate h/f Masood Shareef, Advocate for Respondent No.1(b). CORAM: SANJAY A. DESHMUKH , J.
DATE: 18 th JUNE, .
CIVIL APPLICATION (S) NO.120/2022:
Heard.
2.
This is an application for setting aside abatement in bringing legal representative of the respondent on record. For the reasons stated in the application which are found satisfactory showing sufficient cause for causing delay, the application is allowed.
The application for setting aside abatement in bringing legal representative of the respondent on record is set aside.
5.
The application is allowed and disposed of.
C IVIL APPLICATION (S) NO.121/2022 :
Heard.
2.
This is an application for condonation of delay of
150 days in bringing legal heirs of respondent on record and for setting aside abatement in bringing legal heirs of the respondent on record.
For the reasons stated in the application which are found satisfactory showing sufficient cause for causing delay, the application is allowed.
The delay caused in filing the application for bringing the legal representatives of deceased respondent on record is condoned and abatement order is set aside. 5.
The application is allowed and disposed of.
CIVIL APPLICATION (S) NO.122/2022:
Heard.
2.
This is an application for bringing legal heirs of respondent on record.
The learned counsel for the respondent is opposing to allow the application, however, as the reasons stated in the application are found satisfactory showing sufficient cause for condoning the delay, the application is allowed.
Necessary amendment be carried out within a week. The application is allowed and disposed of. CIVIL APPLICATION (S) NO.736/2023:
Heard.
2.
This is an application for bringing legal of
respondent on record.
For the reasons stated in paragraph 2 and 4 of the application, the application is allowed.
The legal heirs of respondent No.1(a) as mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application be brought on record within a week.
SECOND APPEAL NO.36 OF 2012:
Stand over after two weeks.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) NSN