← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2742/2024allowed

Dharamendra Keshwsingh Chavan And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department Of Labour, Industrial An Energy, Mumbai And ORS

2025-02-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:1244-DB

18. WP 2782 of 2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2742/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2782/2024 Dharmendra Keshwsingh Chavan and others ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Labour, Industrial and Energy, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mrs. S.P. Giratkar, Advocate for petitioners/applicants Mr. A.A. Madiwale, AGP for respondent No.1 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 07/02/2025 1.

By this application, the petitioners/applicants are seeking leave to amend by adding proposed petitioners to the petition, for which the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 has given no objection.

2.

In view of the same, the civil application is allowed. The petitioners are directed to carry out the amendment forthwith.

3.

Advocate Mrs. S.P. Giratkar is appearing for the newly added petitioners.

WRIT PETITION NO.2782/2024 1.

Learned Advocate for the petitioners, upon instructions, submitted that the issue in the matter is already decided in Writ Petition No.1063/2024; therefore, this petition has become infructuous.

18. WP 2782 of 2024.odt 2.

The statement made by the learned Advocate for the petitioners is accepted.

3.

In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar