← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/839/2016allowed

Vikas Mohanji Rahangdale (In Jail) v. Divisional Commissioner Nagpur Division Nagpur And Another

2016-12-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain1 pages

1 wp839.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 839 OF 2016 (VIKAS MOHANJI RAHANGDALE ..VS. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR DN. & ANR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms S.B.Khobragade, Advocate for Petitioner.

Shri J.Y.Ghurde, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 21, 2016.

1.

Heard.

2.

Submission of the respondents that mother is not competent to control and supervise the petitioner appears to be erroneous.

3.

The petitioner has been convicted in 2013 and released on more than one occasions from jail. There is no report of untoward conduct by him.

4.

In this situation, the only reason given for denying parole is unsustainable. The impugned order dated 29/08/2016 is accordingly quashed and set aside. 3.

The respondents are directed to release the petitioner on parole within two weeks after obtaining necessary bonds and undertaking.

JUDGE JUDGE RRaut..