← Library
Bombay High CourtCAA/156/2014dismissedrule discharged

Vinayak Narayanrao Pathak And Others v. Gajanan S/O Laxman Madake And Others

2015-02-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

caa156-14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (A) NO. 156 OF 2014 IN APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO. 3 OF 2006 (D) Vinayak Narayan Pathak and others ...Versus...

Gajanan Lalxman Madke and others.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.R. Deshpande, Advocate for the applicants CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 18.02.2015 The applicants have filed this application praying that the office of this court be directed to search the record of the trial court. The office has put a note on the record that the record and proceedings of the trial court were not called and were not received by the office of this court.. The applicants have not been able to establish that the record and proceedings were called by this court.

In view of this, the prayer made in the application cannot be considered. Civil application is dismissed. Needless to say that the applicants are at liberty to take appropriate steps in the matter, if so advised.

JUDGE Hirekhan