← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6171/2010admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Viom Networks Limited, Through Its Authorized Representative, Shri Sanjay Ghungrud v. State Of Maharashtra, Through The Secretary And Another

2019-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak1 pages

wp.6171.10 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.6171 of 2010 (VIOM Networks Limited vs. State of Maharashtra & another) with Writ Petition No.6174 of 2010 (Twenty First Century Infratele Limited vs. State of Maharashtra & another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= OfÏce notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri M. Anilkumar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.

Shri Amol Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 8 th APRIL, 2019.

The parties are agreeing that the controversy involved in the present matter is covered by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Bharti Tele-Ventures Ltd. & another vs. State of Maharashtra & another, reported in 2007(4) Mh.L.J. 105. The petition has to be allowed by quashing and setting aside the resolution dated 19/10/2010.

Hence, the petition is allowed and the impugned resolution dated 19/10/2010 is quashed and set aside.

JUDGE JUDGE *sandesh