Shakil S/O Hamid Mansuri And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Department Of Urban Development, Mumbai Thr. Principal Secretary And ORS

06.10.caw.2300.17

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 2300/2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 965/2017 (Shakil Hamid Mansuri and others VS. State of Maharashtra and others ) ...........................

............................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 6th October, 2017.

Adv.Kapgate, who appears for petitioners/applicants is stated to be indisposed. Adv. C.K.Bade, points out that he has been opposing adjournments since long as interim orders are operating.

2.

It is within knowledge of this Court that on last 2 to 3 dates, adjournments are being obtained by petitioners. 3.

In this situation, we permit the respondent no.4 to hold meeting as prayed for in Civil Application No.2300/2017; however resolutions passed therein shall not be given effect to, till next date.

List on 30th October, 2017, Civil Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare