← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1901/2016ca disposed off

Vidarbha Irrigation Devp. Corporation, Through Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washi v. Jagat Mohansing Rathod And Others

2016-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre2 pages

caf.2166.16 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAF] No.2166 of 2016 in First Appeal Stamp No.20336 of 2015 (V.I.D.C., through its Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim vs.

Jagat Mohansing Rathod and others) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri J.A. Malnas, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri K.R. Lule, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 25 th NOVEMBER, 2016.

Heard.

Perusal of the application discloses sufficient cause and, therefore, it deserves to be allowed.

The application is allowed and disposed of. The delay is condoned.

Civil Application [CAF] No.556/2016 :

Heard.

The impugned judgment and order shows that the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Washim was party to the proceedings before the Reference Court. The impugned judgment and order has been passed in a reference, which was of the year 2014 when the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation was already in existence and as a matter of record, there was no such entity in existence as 'Minor Irrigation Department' of its own and independently of the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation and, therefore, prima facie it appears that in the reference itself, the

caf.2166.16 2 V.I.D.C. should have been joined as a party-respondent. According to the applicant, enhancement is on the higher side, which is going to be the first appeal in law. For these reasons, I am of the view that this application deserves to be allowed.

The application is allowed. Leave to file the appeal is granted. The appeal be registered.

The application is disposed of.

First Appeal Stamp No.20336/2015 :

Heard.

Admit.

Call for record and proceedings.

Shri Malnas, learned Counsel waives notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Shri Lule, learned A.G.P. waives for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

Civil Application [CAO] No.1901/2016 :

Heard.

In a connected matter i.e. First Appeal No.396/2014, the respondents have been allowed to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited against solvent surety and remaining amount against an undertaking. Therefore, this application deserves to be allowed.

The claimant is permitted to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited in this Court against furnishing of a solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) and remaining amount by furnishing usual undertaking. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

*sdw JUDGE