Anjali W/O Suraj Pidurkar v. Suraj Jagannath Pidurkar

1 28 MCA 336.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1059 OF 2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION [TR] NO.336 OF 2025 [Anjali w/o Suraj Pidurkar .vs. Suraj Jagannath Pidurkar] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.D. Hajare, Advocate for Applicant.

Shri M.R. Ali, Advocate for Non-Applicant.

..............

CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 10.11.2025 .

1.

By this application, the applicant is seeking amendment to the application stating that the facts which are required to be brought on record are based upon subsequent events and, therefore, the same are necessary to be brought on record to decide the present application in proper perspective. 2.

Hence, for the reasons stated in the application, the application for amendment is allowed.

3.

The applicant is directed to carry out the amendment within a period of one week and supply the amended copy to the non-applicant and also place on record the amended copy of application.

4.

List the matter after two weeks.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) Gulande