Shantaram S/O. Waman Bhalerao v. Prajkta W/O. Shantaram Bhalerao And Anotehr

revn159.17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.159/2017 Shantaram s/o Waman Bhalerao ..vs.. Prajakta w/o Shantaram Bhalerao & anr. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Ms D. V. Sapkal, Advocate Appointed for non applicant. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 16, 2018 1.

The applicant and his counsel are absent. Ms Sapkal, Advocate appointed for the non applicant is present. 2.

In the morning session, when this matter was called out, applicant and his counsel were absent. In order to give one chance, the matter was kept in the second half. Even in the second half, the applicant and his counsel are absent nor there is any request for adjournment on their behalf. That shows that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the revision.

3.

In view of above, the revision application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

4.

Professional charges payable to Ms D. V. Sapkal, Advocate appointed by the Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur are quantified at Rs.1,500/-.

JUDGE kahale