Bombay High CourtCP/363/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Draupadabai Wd/O Prakash Jaisinhkar v. Yashwant M. Kamble, Superintending Engg., M.S.E.B., Akola

2017-01-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 cp363.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 363 OF 2015 (SMT. DRAUPADABAI PRAKASH JAISINHKAR....VS.. YASHWANT M. KAMBLE.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.S.Sambare, adv. h/f. Shri C.A.Joshi, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri R.E.Moharir, Advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JANUARY 16, 2017.

The learned advocates for the respective parties submit that the grievance of the petitioner does not survive as she is given all the benefits as per the award passed by the Labour Court in Reference IDA No. 11 of 2016 on 26th March, 2014.

In view of the above, I am not inclined to exercise jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The petition is disposed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.

JUDGE RRaut..