← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2398/2015admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Mohd. Riyazuddin S/O Mohd. Bashiruddin Taher v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry Of Municipal Administarionm, Mumbai And Others

2016-01-06Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP3594-13 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.W. NO.2398/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3594/2013 (MOHD. RIYAZUDDIN MOHD. BASHIRUDDIN TAHER VERSUS STATE OF MAH. & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.L. Khapre, counsel for the petitioner. Ms T. Khan, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 3.

Shri Prajapati h/f Shri S.D. Chopde, counsel for the R-4. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 6 , 2016.

Perused the proposed amendment. The learned counsel for the respondent no.4 does not have objection to the prayer made. The amendment should be carried out within a period of one week.

The civil application is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE APTE