← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2818/2024ca disposed off

Ratneshwar Vyayam Prasarak Krida Va Shikshan Prasrak Mandal Amani, Through Its President And 1 v. The Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati And 2 Others

2025-01-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar2 pages

(1) 4 ca 2818-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW ) NO. 2818 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3389 OF 2014 Ratneshwar Vyam Prasarak Krida Va Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Amani and another Vs.

The Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati Division, Amravati and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------- - - - - - Shri P.P. Thakre, Advocate for petitioners Shri B.M. Lonare, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 3 CORAM : SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

DATE : 10/01/2025 The application is filed seeking modification/clarification of the order dated 08/06/2022, in CAW No. 825/2022, by this Court, in the alternative grant of early hearing by any fixed date.

2.

I have gone through the order passed by this Court on 05/09/2024. There is no ambiguity in the order. It also reveals from the record that report is filed by Education Officer. It revealed from the record that vide communication dated 05/07/2022, as per the Accounts Officer the difference in payment is drawn as Rs.13,74,988/-. This letter also made clear that the petitioner/Management and respondent agreed

(2) 4 ca 2818-2024 to refer this dispute to Accounts Officer to ascertain the difference. As such, Education Officer fixed the amount of difference as Rs.13,74,988/-. It is the contention of the petitioner that it is wrongly calculated. However, in my considered opinion, this cannot be decided unless the parties would be heard finally. There is already execution filed by respondent No.2, for recovery of the said amount. As such, list the matter for final hearing on 10/02/2025. 3.

Application stands disposed of.

(SMT M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) Jayashree..