Bombay High CourtABA/735/2016dismissed

Raju @ Rajendra Madhusudan Lohiya v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Achalpur Amravati

2017-06-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 aba735.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRI. APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 735 OF 2016 (RAJU @ RAJENDRA MADHUSUDAN LOHIYA....VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS ACHALPUR, DIST. AMRAVATI) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.M.Patwardhan, Advocate for applicant.

Shri N.R.Patil, A.P.P. for Non-applicant.

CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : JUNE 05, 2017.

The applicant has sought pre-arrest bail in the crime registered against him for the offences punishable under Sections 353 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x), 3(2)(v)(a), 3(1)(r) and 3(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. This Court has passed an order on 1st November, 2016 granting interim protection to the applicant. The learned A.P.P. has submitted that the chargesehet is ready and may be filed during this week.

However, after hearing the learned advocate for the applicant and going through the application filed by the applicant, I find that the applicant has not made any statement about the antecedents. As in my view, the involvement of the applicant seeking pre-arrest bail in any other crime/ offence is relevant consideration and it is lacking in the present application, the application is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to file fresh application, if so advised. JUDGE RRaut..