Bombay High CourtWP/479/2016dismissedrule discharged

Priyanka W/O. Surendra Sonule v. Surendra S/O. Namdeorao Sonule

2016-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp479.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.479/2016 Priyanka w/o Surendra Sonule ..Versus..

Surendra s/o Namdeorao Sonule - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 29.1.2016 Heard Shri R.G. Somkuwar, advocate for the petitioner/wife.

The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the trial Court rejecting the application (Exh. No.38) filed by the petitioner/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The learned trial Judge has recorded that the application is moved when the final arguments are going on. The impugned order does not suffer from any irregularity or illegality. I see no reason to interfere with the impugned order. The writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

JUDGE Tambaskar.