Sou. Rajani W/O Gajanan Karekar v. Gajanan Kamlakar Karekar
1 9 cao 1475-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1475/2023 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.21587/2023 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO.6022/2023 (REJECTED) Sou. Rajani Gajanan Karekar Vs.
Gajanan Kamlakar Karekar - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.N. Singh, Advocate for appellant CORAM :
SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.
DATED :
21/12/ The application is filed for condonation of delay of 43 days in filing application for restoration of Second Appeal. Second Appeal Stamp No.6022/2023 came to be dismissed for want of removal of office objections by the order of the Register (Judicial) dated 06/07/2023. Due to inadvertent mistake on the part of the Advocate, the objections could not be removed and when it was noticed, the matter was dismissed.
2.
The application is supported by affidavit of Advocate.
3.
As such, I am inclined to allow the application, subject to costs of Rs.1000/-, as Advocate has not shown due diligence.
2 9 cao 1475-2023 Accordingly, the application is allowed.
4.
The delay in filing restoration application is hereby condoned subject to costs of Rs.1000/- to be paid to the Vidarbha Lady Lawyers Association, Nagpur within a period of two weeks. 5.
The Registry is directed to register the Misc. Civil Application.
6.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO.21587/2023 1.
The present application is filed for restoration of second appeal which was rejected by the order of the Registrar (Judicial). The Registrar (Judicial) passed conditional order on 06/07/2023, for removal of office objections. After lapse of 14 days period, the Second Appeal Stamp No.6022/2023 is dismissed.
2.
It is submitted that due to inadvertent mistake on the part of Advocate, the office objections could not be removed. As the application is supported by affidavit of learned Counsel for appellant, the application is allowed.
3 9 cao 1475-2023 3.
The order passed by the Registrar (Judicial) dated 06/07/2023 is hereby set aside.
4.
The Registry is directed to register the Second Appeal on its original stamp number, subject to costs as directed above in C.A. No.1475/2023.
5.
After registration of Second Appeal, appellant to remove office objections within two weeks.
JUDGE R.S. Sahare