M/S Lalit Developers And Bulders, A Partnership Firm Nagpur And Others v. Harshal S/O Ramakant Gaikwad Through Their P.O.A., Shri Ramakant V. Gaikwad And 2 Others

1 ao143.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

APPEAL AGAINST ORDER NO.143 OF 2014 (M/s. Lalit Developers and Builders and others ..vs.. Harshal s/o Ramakant Gaikwad and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.R. Khamatkar, Advocate h/f. Shri S.P. Kshirsagar for the appellants, Shri R.V. Gaikwad, Advocate for the respondent No.1 CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 16-1-2015 Shri R.R. Khamatkar, the learned Advocate requests on behalf of the learned Advocate for the appellants for an adjournment. The appeal is circulated for today. There are two Advocates on record. Shri R.R. Khamatkar, the learned Advocate refuses to make any submissions on the appeal.

Heard Shri R.V. Gaikwad, the learned Advocate for the respondent No.1.

Admit.

Shri R.V. Gaikwad, learned Advocate, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent No.1. Civil Application No.161 of 2014.

After considering the facts on the record, I am not satisfied that the appellants have made out any case for grant of interim order.

2 ao143.14 The civil application is dismissed.

JUDGE pma