Ramesh Dyanoba Parimal v. The State Of Maha., Through Collector, Yavatmal

2023:BHC-NAG:16312 1 12d.caf.3431.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3431/2023 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 605/2016 Ramesh Dyanoba Parimal Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. A. B. Nakshane, Advocate for Appellant.

Mrs. M. S. Naik, AGP for Respondent(s)/State. Ms. M. Babhulkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM :

MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

DATED :

07.11.2023 CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3431/2023 .

The appellant has filed this application for condonation of delay of 1071 days in filing appeal. There is inordinate delay.

2.

The reason given by the appellant for condoning the delay is paucity of funds and the appellant was not aware about the legal position.

3.

Considering the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned.

4.

The appellant shall waive the interest of delayed period and statutory benefits.

5.

The application stands disposed of.

6.

The appeal be registered.

FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 605/2016 .

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable after Diwali Vacation.

2 12d.caf.3431.23.odt 3.

Ms. M. S. Naik, learned AGP waives notice for respondent(s)/State.

4.

Mrs. M. Babhulkar, learned Counsel waives notice for respondent No.1.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule