Suchit Manohar Derkar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Its P.S.O. P.S. Ballarpur, Dist. Chandrapur

1 21.appp.1952.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO. 1952 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.157/2025 Suchit Manohar Derkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. P. Joshi, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. A. J. Gohokar, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant/State. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J.

DATED : 13/10/2025.

.

This is an application filed for relaxation of the condition of bail.

2.

While granting bail on 27.02.2025, this Court has imposed the condition that the applicant shall not enter into the vicinity of Ballarpur/Ballarsha, District Chandrapur till culmination of the trial.

3.

The applicant was arrested for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 118, 326(g) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3(a) of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

4.

The learned Counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is doing job in the shop of one Suraj Gupta who is also one of the accused. His family is staying in Ballarshah. Because of this order, the applicant is staying at the house of his father-in-law, which is away from Ballarshah. Since last nine months, he is away from village and there is no source of income to his family. He is having old parents. Because of the ailment, the father of the applicant is unable to work for livelihood. The

2 21.appp.1952.2025 applicant is the only earning member of his family. Considering the situation and as while granting bail to the main accused, such condition is not imposed, prayed to relax said condition.

5.

The learned A.P.P. opposed the application stating that, the offence is serious. There is no need to relax of said condition. Hence, prayed to reject the application.

6.

Heard both the learned Counsel for the respective parties.

7.

It appears from the record that the main accused in whose shop the applicant is doing job is also released on bail, but no such condition is imposed on him. 8.

Considering the difficulty faced by the applicant, the condition is relaxed. The application is allowed.

9.

The applicant to cooperate the Investigating Machinery whenever called.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) RGurnule